🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.