🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a sizeable but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated debate over their destiny often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the humans who see them each day.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept threatened to end their lives unless the federal government covers the cost of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Scientists say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, problem solving and group interactions indicate they are deeply intelligent mammals – something one caretaker discovered first-hand.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a role that involved earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She cultivated a special affection for two female belugas with contrasting personalities.

“Eve accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “Both transformed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a context of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park attributes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say indicates the substandard environment in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the public over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and move about with pieces in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but previously stated: “The whales … get far superior health care and constant care than any person in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in the spring following the death of Eos, an sick beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the park believed information of the death were leaked to the news outlets and she was let go not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left her and current and former trainers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “immense manpower”, vehicles and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She backs calls for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official denied a request to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the proposal would have meant a continued existence in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As Canadians, we know that whales should be in the wild, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing permit an relocation that would prolong the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the minister’s remarks indicate a wider lack of awareness of the facts of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As officials work to find a resolution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of food for Indigenous peoples.

A suggested refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has been highly debated. The prospective site, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the prospect of a refuge reflects a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a workable solution in the short term.

Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the site will simulate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|