🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several European countries
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries